dynamic economy and a fair society lies in harnessing the ingenuity, resourcefulness and appetite for hard work of the British people. UKIP MANIFESTO. manifesto UKIP is once again setting the agenda. Introduction to the UKIP Manifesto. 6 WE STAND BY OUR MANIFESTO PLEDGES TO. UKIP manifesto - the full pdf. A pdf of the full UKIP party manifesto Click here to see a summary of the key points of the manifesto.
|Language:||English, Indonesian, German|
|ePub File Size:||19.37 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.20 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Important words in this manifesto. Government - the group of people who run our country. Military covenant - the name for Britain's relationship with the . With this manifesto UKIP are attempting to strengthen the public perception that they are the 'honest party', and to that effect they have made. manifesto outlines our policies in the areas that are of most concern. In the June euro-election, million people voted UKIP – more.
No single piece of news has been more invigorating than the discovery that a member of the clergy of the Church of England has found a vertebra. In the event Reverend Ashenden was forced to step down from his post as Chaplain to the Queen for being controversial, so Murray finished his article with an equally memorable conclusion: But in the long run he may not be. In a nation much in need of heroes, an Anglican Reverend has stepped forward, putting his sincere and serious beliefs ahead of the unserious and insincere pieties of our time.
Everybody — secular or religious — has cause to feel enormous gratitude. Alan Craig makes a fine case for the restoration of a Christian basis for the UK and is right to highlight the differences between Islam and Christianity. Indifference to the transcendent, rejection of accountability to a Creator and incredulity towards an afterlife help explain the blindness to the dangers of Islam, a totalitarian religious-political system where Jihad in the name of Allah and belief in an afterlife and its rewards drive much of the fanaticism.
People do not realise that Islam is incompatible to our culture. Its adherents will not accommodate, for Sharia law expects them to dominate instead.
Sir Winston Churchill lived at a time when Christianity was the bedrock of the nation.
He understood very well the nature of Islam and its contrast with Christianity. He realised our values and virtues were based on Christianity and believed in the providence of God. The nation needs a revival of the historic beliefs that encouraged selflessness, sacrifice, accountability, responsibility, loyalty and other qualities of character. A serious national consideration of how our country and others have benefited from the influence of Christianity in contrast to those who have a different or no religion would be most enlightening.
I am not convinced that Christianity can do very much to save us from Islam.
Certainly the Established Church seems to be full of appeasers. There are only a few who resist this. The Catholic church brings no hope either. The previous Pope said something in his Regensburg speech which resulted in churches being burned and nuns murdered. He ended up having to kiss the Koran. The Koran denies the very basis of Christianity. It may be that modern Christians feel that they have more in common with Muslims than they do with atheists.
Blair probably is in this category. If this theory is correct then we cannot expect Christianity to help prevent the Islamisation of western nations.
Christianity may in practice be counterproductive, in that it legitimises beliefs in things for which there is zero scientific evidence. If one person believes in the miraculous proliferation of loaves and fish, then how can they criticise another who believes in talking rocks and trees giving anti-Semitic instructions to commit murder? Millions of Hindus have been murdered by Islam.
Nuttall did NOT compare himself to Gandhi: His analogy suits my position exactly, therefore I approve of the Christian Manifesto despite being an atheist.
Ukip manifesto 2015 - the key points
Nature abhors a vacuum, and if we allow the foundation of our laws, morals and culture to wither away to nothing, what will rush in? His examination is based on the minute research of brave historical and linguistic experts whose work has, ahem, not been heavily publicised for obvious reasons.
Did he not know it was coming? If not, why not — and if he was against it he should have been removed by the leader before he had the chance to shaft UKIP like almost every other MEP has done.
Our Judeo-Christian foundation is cracking and crumbling,and under continuous attack. The UK and other countries continue to bring in Muslims,knowing already that they will cause permanent and untold damage to their countries.
That is a proven fact that our whole culture. Sharia May has allowed over Sharia Courts to operate in Britain today. We need to wake up and look around the World,and see that whatever country they live,there is death and destruction. There is no love,mercy or forgiveness in their so called scriptures. They are the most serious threat to our citizens from within,by a people who hate us and seek and celebrate our death and destruction.
They have no sense of reason,or respect for Human Life. As election day approached, the impression was that the UKIP campaign had failed to take off. Yet, the party performed strongly in terms of vote share, coming third ahead of the Liberal Democrats with UKIP gathered nearly 4 million votes nationwide, the discrepancy between votes and seats being a result of the first-past-the-post system.
Comparatively, the SNP got 4.
The UKIP Challenge
UKIP denounced the unfairness of the "broken" electoral system which had "disenfranchised" 22 millions of voters, and announced its intention to make electoral reform a new priority.
The challenge for UKIP now is to find the means to build on these second places in the perspective of the general election, by improving its party machine in order to turn its substantial support into actual seats. Evidence of UKIP's progress is also borne out by the fact that the party increased its vote share by more than any other party in constituencies across the country since the previous general election.
The party has worked hard to shed its image as a splinter group of the Conservative party, resulting from the ideological proximity between the two parties but also from the significant number of Tory politicians who have defected to UKIP over the years since its foundation — as was the case for its first two elected MPs in the autumn In order to distance itself from the Conservative party and widen its electoral support base, UKIP has operated a strategic populist shift which has boosted its potential damaging effect on Labour.
Recent academic research by Ford and Goodwin has demonstrated the extent of that threat, showing that a growing proportion of UKIP support comes from traditional Labour backgrounds-the "left-behind" voters. The catch-all dimension of UKIP was illustrated by the European elections, in which the party finished first, taking votes from the three major parties to an unprecedented extent.
However, several studies 27 have shown that the sharpest increase in recent UKIP support has come from non-Tory supporters, vindicating the party's populist strategy.
The insurgent party might even have deprived Labour of a handful of seats, as the UKIP vote was higher than the size of the Tory majority in 9 seats which the Conservative party won from Labour. Following his defeat, Farage kept his word and announced that he was stepping down as party leader, thereby turning a new page of UKIP's history — only to turn it back three days later, prompting an internal civil war reminiscent of UKIP's past leadership quarrels.
Indeed, Farage declared that he had finally withdrawn his resignation following a meeting with the party's national executive committee which had unanimously rejected it, pleading with him to remain as leader.
Senior party figures, among whom the party's economics spokesman Patrick O'Flynn, deplored the "shock and awe" tactics adopted by Nigel Farage during the campaign under the influence of his inner circle of advisers who were taking the party in a hard-right direction comparable to the Tea party movement in the US. They criticised Nigel Farage's aggressive campaign, notably on the issue of foreigners with HIV — a policy which was overtly condemned by Douglas Carswell after the election.
Stuart Wheeler, one of the party's biggest donors, publicly called for the UKIP leader to stand down and give way to a less controversial figure. Farage's critics felt that a proper election contest was needed, and concerns about a drift towards "personality cult" were raised, which might lead UKIP to be seen as Nigel Farage's party — which is already the case actually as UKIP is very much a one man band.
While dismissing the extent of internal dissent and underlining the "phenomenal" support he enjoyed within the party, Nigel Farage let go of two of his closest aides who had been targeted by his detractors. The UKIP leader quickly resumed his grip on the party, purging it of two senior party figures who had been central in the row, Suzanne Evans and Patrick O'Flynn, who both stood down from their paid roles within UKIP and atoned for the turmoil they had caused.
Those questions are very likely to resurface in the future, all the more so since the party's only MP Douglas Carswell is definitely at odds with Farage over tactics and direction.
The evolution of the party towards institutionalisation calls for organisational and ideological changes which are currently under way, but which are also a potential source of tensions within UKIP. The party lost half its representation in the Commons, retaining only one MP — an ex-Tory, meaning that UKIP has still not managed to win a parliamentary seat which did not involve a Tory defector.
Nigel Farage struggled to exist during the campaign, as immigration turned out not to be a central issue and he was eclipsed by the new rising SNP leader.
He resorted to aggressive tactics and rhetoric in order to capture attention, causing a sense of unease within the party ranks which came to the surface in the aftermath of the election. Beyond the general election, what was at stake in the episode of factional infighting was the referendum campaign to come: This was explicitly articulated by Stuart Wheeler and Douglas Carswell, who called for a less confrontational figure to take the lead.
He is clearly not ready to relinquish his role in the party and take a back seat at the precise moment when the referendum he has dedicated his entire political career to obtaining is about to take place — this is the fight of his life: Nigel Farage's credibility has been severely damaged by this episode of "unresignation", which might leave traces in public opinion as well. His attitude conflicts with his recurrent denunciation of professional politicians clinging to power for their own interests in supposed contrast with his party and himself — the difference is not that clear anymore.
In response to this apparent contradiction, Farage's argument that holding a leadership election in the run-up to the referendum would be a "massive, massive mistake" hardly conceals an authoritarianism which is a typical feature of populist parties.
In the words of Patrick O'Flynn, it risks making UKIP appear as an "absolute monarchy" 31 whereas it purports to embody popular democracy.
Wmatrix corpus analysis of UK General Election Manifestos
It shows that contrary to what some detractors had anticipated, the UKIP bubble has not burst yet: For the time being, the party's prospects for the general election look promising.
Who will lead the party then is another question, although Nigel Farage has recently declared that he wants to remain leader for 20 more years — a provocative joke which some in his party may have found hard to laugh at. Biteback Publishing, Explaining support for the radical right in Britain , Oxon: Routledge, Explaining support for the radical right in Britain, Oxon: Available online at https: Main journal in British area studies published in France.
While it will end the current work capability assessments, it will not pay child benefits for non-UK resident children of foreign citizens and will prohibit foreign nationals resident here from benefits until the have paid UK tax for five years. UKIP will introduce a selective and limited Australian style points-based immigration system.
Immigration for permanent settlement must be strictly limited and workers on permits will be expected to possess private health insurance as a condition of entry to the UK, as will students.
One of the most significant problems has been that immigrants from the European Union have enjoyed access to social housing on the same basis as British citizens. The party will abolish Stamp Duty see section It will encourage the establishment of new grammar schools, and will waive tuition fees for further and higher education in subjects vital to our national life: science, technology, engineering, mathematics.
UKIP opposes gender confusion ideologies and the implementation of compulsory LGBT-inclusive relationships education in primary schools, due to be introduced from September The transport policy is to support the transition to electric vehicles. However the electric charging infrastructure is not keeping pace.
Full text issues
We will support the installation of charging stations by diverting funds from the electric car subsidy.During and early , UKIP's popularity in opinion polls increased, with many polls indicating that it had overtaken the Liberal Democrats for third place. Key messages UKIP leader Nigel Farage introduced his party's "gold standard" manifesto "Believe in Britain" by claiming it was the only one that had been "fully costed" and independently verified by the Centre for Economics and Business Research.
Nigel Farage struggled to exist during the campaign, as immigration turned out not to be a central issue and he was eclipsed by the new rising SNP leader. The German woman was arrested and jailed and fined. In the weeks up to the election, gaffes and controversial comments multiplied, leading several parliamentary candidates to stand down. Its ambition was clearly to show that UKIP has reached a new stage in its evolution, reflecting the process of professionalization it has been undergoing in the last couple of years.
The challenge for UKIP now is to find the means to build on these second places in the perspective of the general election, by improving its party machine in order to turn its substantial support into actual seats. An Australian-style points based system and a five-year ban on unskilled immigration. Quel bilan pour le UKIP?